Archive for June, 2009|Monthly archive page
Third party integrations speeding up
There is a increasing trend in getting more and more contributions from third parties to Teamwork – which is great news for us! Just received a Polish translations, will soon release a Teamwork plug-in for Thunderbird, and there are at least two software houses that will use Teamwork as a module in a more extended application suite. We are building a dedicated section on the web site for contributors, you can get previews on Pietro’s twitter stream here
Teamwork release 4.2.10080

Meeting section improved.
This new release contains principally bug fixes.
Download it here; the installer will upgrade your web application; the database schema in this release will be changed (it just adds a new column in “twk_disc_point” table).
Feature:
- We have added the possibility for each attendee of a meeting to add new discussion points. Every discussion point now has an owner so a simple attendee can add new discussion points and modify them (but only his own ones).
Bugs:
-Fixed some bugs on the new skin Ulm in Internet Explorer
-Fixed bug on cost tab in the link of descendant
-Fixed a bug on agenda week size
-Fixed a bug on search field
-Fixed a bug on process back-office
Teamwork release 4.2.10025
Here you find the main features of this new Teamwork’s release.
There are also some bug-fixes which are listed at the end of this post.
The first feature is an improvment on the task editor tree which now is comfortable as the issue multi line editor.

The second added feature is a new print page for the task costs. This page is available from the tab “cost” in the project editor.

The third interesting feature is the new combo added in the check missing worklog.
This combo, which is already available in most Teamwork search forms, lets you write several space separated names for multi select.

Bugs:
- Fixed bug in timesheet day portlet with a too long action.
- Fixed bug on the error page on internet Explorer.
- Fixed a bug on timesheet page total calculation.
- Fixed a bug on multiple generation of personal details for new resources.
Download it here; the installer will upgrade your web application; the database schema is unchanged.
Simplistic cost/benefit evaluations of organizational tools adoption
I’ve recently received yet another request of a cost-benefit analysis given by the adoption of Teamwork, in general, of project and groupware management software. Not always in those exact terms, but we do periodically receive such requests. One may rephrase the question as “what is the exact economical gain given by adopting Teamwork”?
Very superficially, this looks like a clear question, which requires an exact answer. Let’s take a closer look.
What does it mean “adopting Teamwork”? If one takes even a cursory look at Teamwork user guide, one should quickly realize that for a tool that can integrate at so many different levels with IT infrastructure, this may mean all sorts of different things: one may be handling just high level projects, sharing them on the web, or one may have integrated it from intranet authentication and certification forms, following every little action in the company.
One may be using the exchange function with Subversion, Google calendars and Twitter, so even the boundaries between what is done in the company by Teamwork and what is done by other applications is blurred. So “adopting Teamwork” has different meanings for each adoption process.
But there is an even bigger conceptual mistake that is lingering here, given by the first part of the question, “exact economical gain”: i.e. that taking steps in improving quality of work, by implementing software aided organizational procedures, is a purely economical gain that can be accounted for say is a year after the reorganization. Anybody that has experience in reorganization and working on quality of work and communication knows that consequences cannot be evaluated so simplistically, though they can be great, and span an entire work life.
This said, the benefit that one will have basically depends on the plan and determination of the leader that is introducing innovation, by her/his culture, open mindedness and experience in the field and in human relationship, and the respect that she gets from the team; and we believe that in some cases (not all), Teamwork can be of help for such individuals, more structured help than just a to-do list shared online. But don’t ask us to fool you with numbers thrown at random; you should probably be very suspicious of vendors that promise X% “gains in efficiency” by doing this or that. Our customer list is partly public, the best way is to ask them, and everybody will give a different answer. Just my two cents.
Pietro Polsinelli
Teamwork release 4.2.9810
This is the first patch after the release of Teamwork 4.2, it includes some bug fixes. Download it here; the installer will upgrade your web application; the database schema is unchanged.
Features:
– Added in the list of worklog on a specific assignment the possiblity to change the staus of all selected worklogs with one click.
- Improved “check missing worklogs”.
Bugs:
- Fixed a bug in first saving of LDAP data.
- Fixed a bug on import tweets from Twitter.
-Fixed a bug in the document search page.
-Fixed a bug in the meeting discussion point list.
-Fixed a permission bug for agenda event owner.
Leave a Comment




